Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

NOTE 9 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

 

Measurement of fair value under U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value, as of the measurement date, into three broad levels, which are described below:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

 

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and also considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

 

Securities. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within level 1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities such as U.S. Treasuries and exchange-traded equity securities. For securities traded in secondary markets for which quoted market prices are not available, the Company generally relies on pricing services provided by independent vendors. Such independent pricing services are to advise the Company on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio. As part of the Company’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. When a questionable price exists, the Company investigates further to determine if the price is valid. If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value. The Company has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in discussions with the pricing source regarding their methods of price discovery. Securities measured with these techniques are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy and often involve using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where available. Examples include U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

Interest Rate Swap Agreements. The fair value is estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy. These fair value estimations include primarily market observable inputs such as yield curves and option volatilities, and include the value associated with counterparty credit risk.

 

Interest Rate Cap. The fair value is estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy. These fair value estimations include primarily market observable inputs such as yield curves and option volatilities.

 

 

Impaired Loans. Impaired loans are measured and reported at fair value when full payment under the loan terms is not probable. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of expected future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate in a discounted cash flow calculation, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Expected cash flows are based on internal inputs reflecting expected default rates on contractual cash flows. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value described in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10 and would generally result in a higher value than the exit-price approach. For loans measured using the estimated fair value of collateral less costs to sell, fair value is generally determined based on appraisals performed by certified and licensed appraisers using inputs such as absorption rates, capitalization rates, and market comparables, adjusted for estimated costs to sell. Management modifies the appraised values, if needed, to take into account recent developments in the market or other factors, such as changes in absorption rates or market conditions from the time of valuation, and anticipated sales values considering management’s plans for disposition. Such modifications to the appraised values could result in lower valuations of such collateral. Estimated costs to sell are based on current amounts of disposal costs for similar assets. These measurements are classified as level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustment upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly based on the same factors identified above. The amount recognized as an impairment charge related to impaired loans that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis was $2,387,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and $1,628,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

Other real estate owned. Other real estate assets (“OREO”) acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less selling costs. Any write-downs to fair value at the time of transfer to OREO are charged to the allowance for loan losses subsequent to foreclosure. Values are derived from appraisals of underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analysis. Appraisals are performed by certified and licensed appraisers. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are updated periodically and assets are marked to current fair value, not to exceed the new cost basis. In the determination of fair value subsequent to foreclosure, management also considers other factors or recent developments, such as changes in absorption rates and market conditions from the time of valuation, and anticipated sales values considering management’s plans for disposition, which could result in adjustment to lower the property value estimates indicated in the appraisals. These measurements are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. A loss on the sale and write-downs of OREO of $117,000 was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and $53,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011. These charges were for write-downs in the value of OREO subsequent to foreclosure and losses on the disposal of OREO.

 

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

 

    Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 Using        
    Quoted Prices in                    
    Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant        
    for Identical     Observable Inputs     Unobservable        
    Assets (Level 1)     (Level 2)     Inputs (Level 3)     Total  
    (In Thousands)  
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:                                
Available-for-sale securities:                                
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies   $ -     $ 87,988     $ -     $ 87,988  
Mortgage-backed securities     -       96,521       -       96,521  
State and municipal securities     -       105,929       -       105,929  
Corporate debt     -       5,786       -       5,786  
Interest rate swap agreements     -       557       -       557  
Interest rate cap     -       2       -       2  
Total assets at fair value     -       296,783       -       296,783  
                                 
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:                                
Interest rate swap agreements   $ -     $ 557     $ -     $ 557  

 

    Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using        
    Quoted Prices in                    
    Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant        
    for Identical     Observable Inputs     Unobservable        
    Assets (Level 1)     (Level 2)     Inputs (Level 3)     Total  
    (In Thousands)  
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:                                
Available-for-sale securities                                
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies   $ -     $ 99,622     $ -     $ 99,622  
Mortgage-backed securities     -       92,580       -       92,580  
State and municipal securities     -       100,526       -       100,526  
Corporate debt     -       1,081       -       1,081  
Interest rate swap agreements     -       617       -       617  
Interest rate cap     -       9       -       9  
Total assets at fair value     -       294,435       -       294,435  
                                 
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:                                
Interest rate swap agreements   $ -     $ 617     $ -     $ 617  

 

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 Using      
    Quoted Prices in              
    Active Markets   Significant Other   Significant      
    for Identical   Observable   Unobservable      
    Assets (Level 1)   Inputs (Level 2)   Inputs (Level 3)   Total  
  (In Thousands)  
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:                           
Impaired loans   $ -   $ -   $ 35,126   $ 35,126  
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets      -     -     11,637     11,637  
Total assets at fair value   $ -   $ -   $ 46,763   $ 46,763  

  

    Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using       
    Quoted Prices in              
    Active Markets   Significant Other   Significant      
    for Identical   Observable   Unobservable      
    Assets (Level 1)   Inputs (Level 2)   Inputs (Level 3)   Total  
    (In Thousands)  
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:                          
Impaired loans   $ -   $ -   $ 33,072   $ 33,072  
Other real estate owned     -     -     12,275     12,275  
Total assets at fair value   $ -   $ -   $ 45,347   $ 45,347  

 

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged in a sale between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Current U.S. GAAP excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its fair value disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

 

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’ fair values.

 

Investment securities: Fair values for investment securities held to maturity are generally based on prices provided by independent pricing services. Management evaluates the reasonableness of prices provided by such services, as well as their underlying pricing methodologies. These measurements are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and often involve using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where available.

 

Restricted equity securities: Fair values for other investments are considered to be their cost.

 

 

Loans: For variable-rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair value is based on carrying amounts. The fair value of other loans (for example, fixed-rate commercial real estate loans, mortgage loans, and industrial loans) is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics. The method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value as prescribed by ASC 820 and generally produces a higher value than an exit-price approach. The measurement of the fair value of loans is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Mortgage loans held for sale: Loans are committed to be delivered to investors on a “best efforts delivery” basis within 30 days of origination. Due to this short turn-around time, the carrying amounts of the Company’s agreements approximate their fair values.

 

Derivatives: The fair values of the derivative agreements are based on quoted prices from an outside third party.

 

Accrued interest and dividends receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest and dividends receivable approximates its fair value.

 

Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation using interest rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities. The fair value of the Company’s time deposits do not take into consideration the value of the Company’s long-term relationships with depositors, which may have significant value. Measurements of the fair value of certificates of deposit are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Federal funds purchased: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased approximate their market value.

 

Borrowings: The fair values of borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered by the Federal Home Loan Bank for borrowings of similar terms as those being valued. These measurements are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

 

Trust preferred securities: The fair values of trust preferred securities are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered on the best alternative debt available at the measurement date. These measurements are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

 

Accrued interest payable: The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

 

Loan commitments: The fair values of the Company’s off-balance-sheet financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. Since the majority of the Company’s other off-balance-sheet financial instruments consists of non-fee-producing, variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined they do not have a distinguishable fair value.

 

The carrying amount, estimated fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are presented in the following table. This table includes those financial assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis.

 

 

    March 31, 2012     December 31, 2011  
    Carrying           Carrying        
    Amount     Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value  
    (In Thousands)  
Financial Assets:                                
Level 2 inputs:                                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 228,473     $ 228,473     $ 242,933     $ 242,933  
Investment securities available for sale     285,212       296,224       282,647       293,809  
Investment securities held to maturity     16,214       17,156       15,209       15,999  
Restricted equity securities     4,288       4,288       3,501       3,501  
Mortgage loans held for sale     12,611       12,611       17,859       17,859  
Loans, net     1,894,974       1,894,706       1,808,712       1,811,612  
Accrued interest and dividends receivable     7,975       7,975       8,192       8,192  
Bank owned life insurance contracts     40,780       40,780       40,390       40,390  
Derivatives     560       560       626       626  
                                 
Financial Liabilities:                                
Level 2 inputs:                                
Deposits   $ 2,189,376     $ 2,195,252     $ 2,143,887     $ 2,150,308  
Federal funds purchased     93,385       93,385       -       -  
Borrowings     4,958       5,377       4,954       5,377  
Trust preferred securities     30,514       27,685       30,514       27,402  
Accrued interest payable     1,016       1,016       945       945  
Derivatives     557       557       617       617